Lanaguage Research
Language Education Institute, Seoul National University
Article

On the Intervention Effect Caused by Korean -man

Ilkyu Kim1,*
*Corresponding Author : Assistant Profesor, Department of English, Kangwon National University 346 Jungang-ro, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do 24341, Korea E-mail: 81ilkyu@gmail.com

ⓒ Copyright 2018 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 24, 2018 ; Revised: Nov 02, 2018 ; Accepted: Dec 07, 2018

Published Online: Dec 31, 2018

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to shed light on the nature of the intervention effect, focusing on Korean -man ‘only’. Two most recent studies on the intervention effect caused by Korean -man are critically reviewed, and a new analysis is proposed based on 1) distinction between psychologically salient and non-salient presuppositions, which is based on the notion of the strong contextual felicity, 2) two characteristics of language processing, namely, the serial order of linguistic input and the interactive parallel processing, and 3) different informational statuses of the prejacent meaning of -man depending on different contexts. The current analysis is superior to the two previous studies in that 1) the source of the intervention effect proposed here is psychologically more plausible and that 2) it is compatible with the within- and inter-individual variability among speakers with respect to the degree of the intervention effect.

Keywords: intervention effect; information structure; psychologically (non-)salient presuppositions; strong felicity condition; -man; Korean

References

1.

Abbott, Barbara. (2000). Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1419- 1437.

2.

Beck, Sigrid. (2006). Intervention effects follow from focus. Natural Language Semantics 14, 1-56.

3.

Beck, Sigrid & Shin-Sook Kim. (2006). On wh-and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 339-384.

4.

Chomsky, Noam. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press.

5.

Huang, C. T. James. (1982). Move wh in a language without wh-movement. The Linguistic Review 1, 369-416.

6.

Kartunnen, Lauri. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1, 182-194.

7.

Kim, Kwangsup. (2003). Some issues on the scope of quantifiers (written in Korean). Studies in Generative Grammar 13(2), 305-329.

8.

Kim, Jieun. (2012). A semantic approach to intervention effect (written in Korean). Korean Journal of Linguistics 37(3), 525-546.

9.

Levinson, Stephen. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

10.

Moon, Gui-Sun. (2008). Intervention effects and morpheme 'man' (only). Studies in Generative Grammar 18(3), 349-373.

11.

Noh, Eun-Ju. (2011). A pragmatic approach to intervention effect sentences in Korean: Focus, presupposition, and metarepresentation. Linguistic Research 28(1), 179-197.

12.

Rizzi, Luigi. (1990). Relativized Minimality. MIT Press.

13.

Roberts, Craige. (2011). only: A case study of projective meaning. In The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication Volume 6: Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context, and Models, 1-59.

14.

Simons, Mandy., Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver, & Craige Roberts. (2010). What projects and why? In Proceedings of SALT 20, 309-327.

15.

Soames, Scott. (1979). A projection problem for speaker presuppositions. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 623-666.

16.

Stalnaker, Robert C. (1974). Pragmatic presupposition. In Munitz, M. & Unger, P, eds., Semantics and Philosophy, 197-214. New York University Press.

17.

Strawson, Peter F. (1950). On referring. Mind 59, 320-344.

18.

Tomioka, Satoshi. (2007). Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean wh-interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1570-1590.

19.

Tonhauser, Judith., David Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Mandy Simons. (2013). Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1), 66-109.

20.

Wee, Hae-Kyung. (2007). Intervention effect and information structure. Korean Journal of Linguistics 32(4), 627-652.