Lanaguage Research
Language Education Institute, Seoul National University
Article

Korean wh-Island Sentences: Individual Differences in Acceptability Judgments and Working Memory

Hye-ryeong Hahn1,
*Corresponding Author : Professor, Department of English Education Seowon University Musimseoro 377-3, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28674, Chungcheongbukdo, Korea, E-mail: hyerhahn@seowon.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2019 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 01, 2019 ; Revised: Jul 31, 2019 ; Accepted: Aug 14, 2019

Published Online: Aug 31, 2019

ABSTRACT

While it has been claimed that scrambling in East Asian languages is not subject to wh-island effects, studies into theoretical and experimental syntax have suggested that native Korean speakers vary in their acceptance of island constructions. This study addresses the individual differences in the acceptability judgments of Korean wh-island sentences in terms of working memory. In order to determine if the varied judgments of acceptability are attributable to differences in individuals’ working memory, an acceptability judgment test on various Korean wh-island constructions, and two memory span tests—a reading span test and a digit span test—were administered to 66 adult Korean native speakers. Pearson correlation analysis and a factor analysis were then performed on the participants’ acceptability judgment ratings and memory spans. The results revealed that the individuals’ acceptability judgments for wh-island sentences were not correlated with their reading span or digit span, although the group’s mean acceptability of the constructions gradually decreased as their expected processing complexity increased. These findings indicate that differences in individuals’ working memory are not the source of the observed acceptability variation.

Keywords: wh-island, Korean; acceptability judgment; individual differences; working memory

References

1.

Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips and Amy Weinberg. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language 5, 23-54 .

2.

Baddeley, Alan. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36(3), 189-208 .

3.

Bader, Markus and Jana Häussler (2010). Toward a model of grammatical judgments. Journal of Linguistics 46, 273-330 .

4.

Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. (2013). Intervention in grammar and processing. In Ivano Caponigro and Carlo Cecchetto, eds., From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language, 294-311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

5.

Cho, Jai-Hyoung. (1994). Scrambling in Korean: Crossover, Reconstruction and Binding Theory. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut .

6.

Chomsky, Noam. (1962). The logical basis of linguistic theory. In Morris Halle, ed., Preprints of the Papers for the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, 509-574 .

7.

Chomsky, Noam. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press .

8.

Chung, Dae H. (1996). On the Representation and Licensing of Q and Q-dependencies. Doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles .

9.

Chung, Dae H. (2005). Why is how in Korean insensitive to islands?: A revised nominal analysis. Studies in Modern Grammar 39, 115-131 .

10.

Cowan, Nelson. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1), 51-57 .

11.

Daneman, Meredyth and Patricia Carpenter. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 450-466 .

12.

Diaconescu, Rodica C. and Helen Goodluck. (2004). The pronoun attraction effect for D(iscourse)-linked phrases: Evidence from speakers of a null subject language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(4), 303-319 .

13.

Farmer, Thomas A., Alex B. Fine, Jennifer B. Misyak, and Morten H. Christiansen (2017). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. The Quarterly Journal of Expermental Psychology 70(3), 413-433 .

14.

Frazier, Lyn and Charles Jr Clifton. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4, 93-126 .

15.

Fukuda, Shin, Grant Goodall, Dan Michel, and Henry Beecher. (2012). Is magnitude estimation worth the trouble? In Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 328-336. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project .

16.

Gibson, Edward. (1990). A computational theory of processing overload and garden-path effects. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computational Linguistics, 114-119. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics .

17.

Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag. (2000). Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications .

18.

Gordon, Peter C., Randall Hendrick, and Marcus Johnson. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27, 1411-1423 .

19.

Gordon, Peter C., Randall Hendrick, and Marcus Johnson. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 97-114 .

20.

Grodner, Daniel and Edward Gibson. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science 29(2), 261-290 .

21.

Hahn, Hye-ryeong. (2015a). The acceptability of long-distance wh-scrambling in Korean from a real-time acceptability judgment perspective. Studies in Linguistics 34, 397-420 .

22.

Hahn, Hye-ryeong. (2015b). Scrambling out of a wh-island: Types and acceptability. The Journal of Studies in Language 31(1), 157-177 .

23.

Hahn, Hye-ryeong. (2015c). The resolution of wh-scope ambiguity in Korean and locality bias. Language Research 51, 91-120 .

24.

Hahn, Hye-ryeong and Seungjin Hong. (2014). Processing scrambled wh-construction in head-final languages: Dependency resolution and feature checking. Language and Information 18(2), 59-79 .

25.

Han, Jong-Im. (1992). Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization. Language Research 28, 335-357 .

26.

Hofmeister, Philip and Ivan A. Sag. (2010). Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86, 366-415 .

27.

Hofmeister, Philip, Laura Staum Casasanto, and Ivan A. Sag. (2012a). How do individual cognitive differences relate to acceptability judgments? A reply to Sprouse, Wagers, and Phillips. Language 88, 390-400 .

28.

Hofmeister, Philip, Laura Staum Casasanto, and Ivan A. Sag. (2012b). Misapplying working- .

88.

408-409 .

29.

Hofmeister, Philip, Laura Staum Casasanto, and Ivan A. Sag. (2013). Islands in the grammar? Standards of evidence. In Jon Sprouse and Norbert Hornstein, eds., Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, 42-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

30.

Hong, Sun-Ho. (2004). On the lack of syntactic effects in Korean wh-questions. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 12(3), 43-57 .

31.

Just, Marcel A. and Patricia A. Carpenter. (1987). Speed reading. In Marcel. A. Just and Patricia. A. Carpenter, eds., The Psychology of Reading and Language Processing, 425-452. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon .

32.

Kang, Young-Se. (1986). Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge .

33.

Kim, Bokyoung and Grant Goodall. (2014). An experimental investigation of island effects in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 23. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications .

34.

Kim, Euhee and Myung-Kwan Park. (2016). The relation between working-memory capacity and island effects: A statistical modeling approach. The Journal of Linguistic Science 79, 43-70 .

35.

Kim, Rhang-Hye-Yun. (2003). Scrambling and minimalist program. Studies in Generative Grammar 13, 3-19 .

36.

Kimball, John. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2(1), 15-47 .

37.

King, Jonathan and Marcel A. Just. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 580-602 .

38.

Kluender, Robert. (1991). Cognitive Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, San Diego .

39.

Kluender, Robert. (1992). Deriving island constraints from principles of predication. In Helen Goodluck and Michael Rochemont, eds., Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition and Processing, 241-279. Dordrecht: Kluwer .

40.

Kluender, Robert. (1998). On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective. In Peter Culicover and Louise McNally, eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 29: The Limits of Syntax, 241-79. San Diego, CA: Academic Press .

41.

Ko, Heejeong. (2018). Scrambling in Korean syntax. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 20, 2019 from http://ling.snu.ac.kr/ko/publications/Papers/Ko_Scrambling%20in%20 Korean%20Syntax%20FINAL.pdf .

42.

Lee, Byeong-taek. (2002). Reliability of the reading span test. Psychological Science 11.1, 15-33 .

43.

Lee, Byeong-Taek, Kyoung-Joong Kim, and Myeong-han Zoh. (1996). Working memory and language: Comprehension individual differences in reading span and language processing. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 8(1), 59-85 .

44.

Lee, Hyo-Sang. (1982). Asymmetry in Island Constrains in Korean. MS., University of California at Los Angeles .

45.

Lee, Yong-hun and Yeonkyung Park. (2015). Complex-NP islands in Korean: An experimental approach. In Hai Zhao, ed., 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 240-249. Shanghai, China .

46.

Lee, Young-Suk. (1993). Scrambling as Case-Driven Obligatory Movement. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania .

47.

Miyagawa, Shigeru. (2005). EPP and semantically vacuous scrambling. In Henk van Riemsdijk, Jan Koster, and Harry van der Hulst, eds., The Free Word Order Phenomenon, 181-220. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter .

48.

Miyamoto, Edson, T. and Shoichi Takahashi. (2003). Typing Mismatch Effects in the Processing of Wh-Phrases in Japanese. Manuscript submitted for publication .

49.

Nishigauchi, Taisuke. (1990). Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers .

50.

O'Grady, William. (2008). Does emergentism have a chance? In H. Chan, H. Jacob and E. Kapia, eds., Proceedings of 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 16-35. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press .

51.

O'Grady, William. (2010). An emergentist approach to syntax. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 257-283. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

52.

Park, Hong-Keun. (2010). On some properties of in-situ and ex-situ wh-phrases in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 31(1), 89-118 .

53.

Roberts, Rose and Edward Gibson. (2002). Individual differences in sentence memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(6), 573-598 .

54.

Pesetsky, David. (1987). Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding. In Eric Reuland and Alice G. B ter Meulen, eds., The Representation of (In)definites, 98-129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

55.

Pesetsky, David. (2000). Phrasal Movement and Its Kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

56.

Rizzi, Luigi. (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

57.

Rizzi, Luigi. (2001). Reconstruction, weak island sensitivity, and agreement. In Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia, and Maria Teresa Guasti, eds., Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora and Aspect, 145-76. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications .

58.

Saito, Mamoru. (1989). Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'-movement. In Mark Baltin and Anthony Kroch, eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, 182-200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

59.

Saito, Mamoru. (2004). Japanese scrambling in a comparative perspective. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat and George Tsulas, eds., Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects, 143-163. Dordrecht: Kluwer .

60.

Sohn, Ho-Min. (1980). Theme-prominence in Korean. Korean Linguistics 2, 2-19 .

61.

Sprouse, Jon, Matt Wagers, and Colin Phillips. (2012a). A test of the relation between working memory and syntactic island effects. Language 88, 82-123 .

62.

Sprouse, Jon, Matt Wagers, and Colin Phillips. (2012b). Working-memory capacity and island effects: A reminder of the issues and the facts. Language 88, 401-407 .

63.

Staum Casasanto, Laura, Philip Hofmeister, and Ivan A. Sag. (2010). Understanding acceptability judgments: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments. In Stellan Ohlsson and Richard Catrambone, eds., Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 224-229. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society .

64.

Suh, Chungmok. (1987). WH-Constructions in Korean. Seoul: Top Press .

65.

Ueyama, Ayumi. (2008). Two types of scrambling constructions in Japanese. In A. Barss and T. Langendoen, eds., Anaphora: A Reference Guide, 23-71. Cambridge: Blackwell .

66.

Yoshimura, Noriko. (1992). Scrambling and Anaphora in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles .

67.

Yoon, Jeong-Me. (2013). Undoing and wh-island effects of scrambling in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar 23.1, 41-63 .

68.

Watanabe, Akira. (1992). Subjacency and s-Structure movement of wh-in-Situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 255-291 .