Lanaguage Research
Language Education Institute, Seoul National University
Linguistics

Processing Negative Polarity Items in Korean: Implications from an ERP Study

Myung-Kwan Park1, Eunjeong Oh2, Wonil Chung1,
Corresponding Author: Research Professor Department of English Linguistics and Interpretation & Translation Dongguk University 30 Pildong-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea, E-mail: wonilchung@naver.com

ⓒ Copyright 2020 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 24, 2020 ; Revised: Aug 07, 2020 ; Accepted: Aug 11, 2020

Published Online: Aug 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the neural correlates supporting the processing of two negative polarity items (NPI) (nominal amwu+N+to “any+N+even” and adverbial te isang “any more/longer”) in Korean. Participants read sentences phrase by phrase while their brain activities during the processing of the NPIs and their licensors were being recorded. The results revealed that the NPI licensors in such contexts as positive or interrogative clauses not containing a proper licensor elicited a larger N400 component, possibly reflecting the cost of semantic or pragmatic integration. By contrast, sentences with the adverbial NPI te isang in the negative implicature- inducing “before” clause are not significantly different in ERP responses from those in the negative clause, thus evoking no ERP component. The present findings not only demonstrate semantic and pragmatic effects in neural signatures evoked by varied NPI-licensor relations, but also point to the multi- dimensionality of NPI processing/licensing recruiting semantic/pragmatic integration as well as syntactic dependency formation.

Keywords: NPI; amwu+N+to; te isang; licensor-licensee relation; ERP; N400; semantic integration

References

1.

Baker, C. L. (1970). Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 169-186 .

2.

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on 'semantic P600' effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55-73 .

3.

Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127-143 .

4.

Carlson, G. (1981). Distribution of free-choice any. CLS 17 8.23 .

5.

Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the 'logicality' of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 535-590 .

6.

Choe, H. S. (1988). Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates: A Transformational Approach. Doctoral dissertation, MIT .

7.

Chow, W.-Y. & Phillips, C. (2013). No semantic illusions in the 'Semantic P600' phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1506, 76-93 .

8.

Chung, D.-H. (1993). Negative Polarity Items in Korean: Formal and Distributional Types. Ms. University of Southern California .

9.

Chung, D.-H. (1997). NPI types based on the trigger strength. Proceedings of International Conference on Cognitive Science '97, Seoul, 101-105 .

10.

Drenhaus, H., beim Graben, P., Saddy, D., & Frisch, S. (2006). Diagnosis and repair of negative polarity constructions in the light of symbolic resonance analysis. Brain and Language, 96(3), 255-268 .

11.

Drenhaus, H., Blaszczak, J., & Schütte, J. (2007). Some psycholinguistic comments on NPI licensing. In Estela Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. 180-193 .

12.

Drenhaus, H., Saddy, D., & Frisch, S. (2005). Processing negative polarity items: when negation comes through the backdoor. In Stephan Kepser and Marga Reis (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 145-165 .

13.

Fauconnier, G. (1974). Polarity and the scale principle. Chicago Linguistic Society 13, 188-199 .

14.

Fauconnier, G. (1975). Polarity and the scale principle. In Robin E. Grossman (ed.) Papers from the eleventh meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society. 188-199 .

15.

Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, J. (2007). Mapping sentence form onto meaning: the syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50-58 .

16.

Giannakidou, A. (1998). Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins .

17.

Giannakidou, A. (1999). Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), 367-421 .

18.

Giannakidou, A. (2006). Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language, 82, 575-603 .

19.

Giannakidou, A., & Yoon, S. (2016). Scalar marking without scalar meaning: Nonscalar, nonexhaustive even-marked NPIs in Greek and Korean. Language, 92(3), 522-556 .

20.

Gouvea, Ana C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149-188 .

21.

Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112 .

22.

Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439-483 .

23.

Hoeksema, J. (1994). On the grammaticalization of negative polarity items. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society XX .

24.

Hwang, J. (2013). Typology of NPIs in Korean: Variation and licensing. Language Research 49(3), 829-856 .

25.

Hwang, J. (2009). Semantic function of three forms of negation in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 34, 197-220 .

26.

Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159-201 .

27.

Kadmon, N., & Landman, F. (1993). Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(4), 353-422 .

28.

Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205-225 .

29.

Kim, K.-S. (1999). A Paradox in Korean NPI Licensing. Studies in Generative Grammar, 9, 403-428 .

30.

Kim, S.-S., & Sells, P. (2007). Generalizing the Immediate Scope Constraint on NPI Licensing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Polarity .

31.

Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .

32.

Krifka, M. (1995). The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 25, 209-257 .

33.

Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49 .

34.

Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin .

35.

Ladusaw, W. A. (1980). On the notion 'affective' in the analysis of Negative Polarity Items. Journal of Linguistic Research, 1, 1-16 .

36.

Lahiri, U. (1998). Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics, 6(1), 57-123 .

37.

Lee, H. (2001). The Morphology-Based Semantics of "Any" in English and Korean. Enehak, 31, 127-158 .

38.

Linebarger, M. C. (1980). The Grammar of Negative Polarity. PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge, MA .

39.

Linebarger, M. C. (1987). Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10(3), 325-387 .

40.

Nam, S. (1994). Another type of negative polarity item. In Makoto Kanazawa & Christopher J. Pinon (eds.), Dynamics, polarity and quantification, Stanford: CSLI, 3-15 .

41.

Nam, S. (1998). The typology and licensing conditions of negative polarity items in Korean (Hankwuke pwucengkukeuy yuhyengkwa ku hekacoken). Linguistics, 22, 217-244 .

42.

Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785-806 .

43.

Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 786-803 .

44.

Pablos, L., Doetjes, J., Ruijgrok, B., & Cheng, L. (2012). Backward NPI dependencies in Dutch: an ERP investigation. Poster presented at the 25th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, CUNY Graduate Center, New York .

45.

Paczynski, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). Multiple influences of semantic memory on sentence processing: Distinct effects of semantic relatedness on violations of real-world event/state knowledge and animacy selection restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language 67(4), 426-448 .

46.

Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 407-428 .

47.

Saddy, D., Drenhaus, H. & Frisch, S. (2014). Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs. Brain and Language, 90(1), 495-502 .

48.

Sells, P. (2001). Negative polarity licensing and interpretation. In S. Kuno et al., ed., Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, 3-22. Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University .

49.

Sells, P. (2006). Interactions of negative polarity items in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 11, 724-737 .

50.

Shin, K. Y., & Chung, D.-H. (2009). Remarks on defining Korean NPIs in terms of negation strength. Language and Information, 13(2), 45-57 .

51.

Sitnikova, T., Holcomb, P. J., Kiyonaga, K. A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2037-57 .

52.

van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Vissers, C. T. W. M., & Chwilla, D. J. (2009). Monitoring in language perception: mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 67-82 .

53.

van der Wouden, T. (1997). Negative contexts: Collation, polarity, and multiple negation. Routledge .

54.

van der Wouden, T., & Zwarts, F. (1993). A semantic analysis of negative concord. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp. 202-219 .

55.

Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176-190 .

56.

Von Fintel, K. (1999). NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16, 97-148 .

57.

Yanılmaz, A., & Drury, J. E. (2013). Licensing in Turkish: an ERP study. Poster presented at the 20th Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting, San Francisco .

58.

Zwarts, F. (1995). Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis, 25, 286-312 .

59.

Zwarts, F. (1996). A hierarchy of negative expressions. In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Negation: A Notion in Focus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 169-194 .

60.

Zwarts, F. (1986). Categoriale Grammatica en Algebräsche Semantiek: Een Onderzoeknaar Negatie en Polariteit in het Nederlands. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen .

61.

Zwarts, F. (1998). Three Types of Polarity. In F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs (eds.), Plurality and quantication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 177-238 .