Lanaguage Research
Language Education Institute, Seoul National University
Linguistics

A Pronoun Analysis of Null Arguments in Korean

Hee-Don Ahn1, Sungeun Cho2,
Corresponding Author: Professor Department of English Education Yeungnam University 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea , E-mail: scho1007@ynu.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2020 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 03, 2020 ; Revised: Aug 13, 2020 ; Accepted: Aug 18, 2020

Published Online: Aug 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to account for null arguments in Korean under pro analysis. Korean is a radical pro-drop language; therefore pro is extremely productive. Thus, if pro analysis can capture interpretations of null arguments without postulating a separate operation such as argument ellipsis, it will be a good example of Occam’s razor. We highlight the premise that pro is a silent form of an overt pronoun. This paper shows that the pronoun analysis of null arguments is both conceptually and empirically advantageous. Sloppy readings and nonspecific readings for mass nouns are regarded as data apparently supporting argument ellipsis. However, we show that the data can be reanalyzed under parallelism between null arguments and overt pronouns. We also show that only pronoun analysis can give a solid explanation to scope interaction between disjunction and negation and ellipsis-resistant constituents. We further discuss some advantages of pronoun analysis in comparison with another type of pro analysis, N(P) substitution analysis.

Keywords: null argument; pronoun analysis; argument ellipsis; N(P) substitution analysis

References

1.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2009). On the absence of CP ellipsis in English and Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 34, 267-281 .

2.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2010). More on the absence of CP ellipsis: A reply to Park (2009). Studies in Generative Grammar, 20, 549-576 .

3.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2011a). Notes on apparent DP ellipsis: A reply to Lee & Kim (2010). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36, 457-471 .

4.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2011b). On sloppy-like interpretation of null arguments. Linguistic Research, 28(3), 471-492 .

5.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2012a). Some ellipsis phenomena in Korean. In B.-S. Park, ed. Proceedings of the 14th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 3-38. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Co .

6.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2012b). On null arguments and clausal ellipsis in Korean. Language and Linguistics, 57, 95-124 .

7.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2012c). Fragments vs. null arguments in Korean. In S. Muller, ed. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Chungnam National University Deejeon, 369-387. CSLI Publications .

8.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2013). On apparent problems of pro analysis of null arguments. Studies in Generative Grammar, 23, 509-524 .

9.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2019). Yengnonhanguy pro(yengtaymyengsa) pwunsek cayko [A Pro Analysis of Null Arguments Revisited]. Language and Linguistics, 86, 85-112 .

10.

Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2020). Yengnonhanguy taymyengsa pwunsekey tayhan caykochal [Reconsideration of pronoun analysis of null arguments]. Language and Information, 24, 1-13 .

11.

Bach, E, J., Bresnan, W., & Wasow, T. (1974). An unnecessary and insufficient criterion for deletion rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 609-614 .

12.

Cho, D.-I. (1996). Anaphor and pronominal. Language Research, 32, 621-635 .

13.

Chomsky, N. (1995), Bare phrase structure. In G. Webelhuth, ed. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, 383-439. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell .

14.

Funakoshi, K. (2012). On Headless XP-Movement/Ellipsis. Lingistic Inquiry, 43, 519-562 .

15.

Funakoshi, K. (2013). Disjunction and object drop in Japanese. Tampa Papers in Linguistics, 4, 11-20 .

16.

Han, C.-H, Lidz, J., & Musolino. J. (2007). V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1), 1-47 .

17.

Han, C.-H., Kim, K.-M., Moulton, K., & Lidz, J. (2019). Null objects in Korean: experimental evidence for the argument ellipsis analysis. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry .

18.

Hoji, H. (1998). Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 127-152 .

19.

Kim, K.-M. (2019). The syntax of Korean anaphora: An experimental investigation. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University .

20.

Kim, K.-M., & Han, C.-H. (2016). Inter-speaker variation in Korean pronouns. In P. Grosz, and P. Patel-Grosz, eds. The impact of pronominal form on interpretation, 349-373. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .

21.

Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 255-284 .

22.

Kuno, S. (1982). Principles of discourse deletion-case studies from English, Russian and Japanese. Journal of Semantics, 1, 61-93 .

23.

Landau, I. (2018). Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis. Glossa, 3, 1-37 .

24.

Lee, W. (2011). Zero realization of arguments revisited. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36, 1031-1052 .

25.

Lee, W. (2016). Argument ellipsis vs. V-stranding VP ellipsis in Korean: Evidence from disjunction. Linguistic Research, 33, 1-20 .

26.

Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2010). DP ellipsis as independent phenomena from pro in pro-drop languages. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35, 1009-1029 .

27.

Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press .

28.

Merchant, J. (2013). Diagnosing ellipsis. In L. Cheng and N. Cover, eds. Diagnosing Syntax, 537-542. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

29.

Moon, G.-S. (2010). Null arguments redux. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 18, 67-92 .

30.

Moon, G.-S. (2015). A non-isomorphism approach to null-argument anaphora in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 25.1, 217-236 .

31.

Moon, G.-S. (2017). Co-varying pronominal anaphors: Focusing on bound variable pronouns. Studies in Generative Grammar, 27.1, 221-239 .

32.

Moon, G.-S. (2019). On the validity of the skolemized choice function approach to small pro anaphora in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 29.2, 413-439 .

33.

Murasugi, K.(1991). Noun phrases in Japanese and English: A study in syntax, learnability and acquisition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs .

34.

Oku, S. (1998). LF copy analysis of Japanese null arguments. CLS, 34, 299-314 .

35.

Oku, S. (2016). A note on ellipsis-resistant constituents. Nanzan Linguistics, 11, 56-70 .

36.

Otani, K., & Whitman, J. (1991). V-raising and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 345-358 .

37.

Park, B.-S., & Bae, S. (2012). Identifying null arguments: sometimes pro, sometimes ellipsis. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 37, 845-866 .

38.

Park, B.-S., & Oh, S.-R. (2013). Identifying null arguments with ellipsis. Studies in Generative Grammar, 23, 155-169 .

39.

Park, M.-K. (1994). A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs .

40.

Park, M.-K. (2014). Some remarks on the licensing condition on the null argument in Korean (and Japanese). Studies in Generative Grammar, 24, 499-513 .

41.

Runić, J. (2014). A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and. argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs .

42.

Sakamoto, Y. (2015). Disjunction as a new diagnostic for (argument) ellipsis. NELS, 45, 15-28 .

43.

Saito, M. (2007). Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research, 43, 203-227 .

44.

Saito, M. (2017). Ellipsis, In M. Shibatani, S. Miyagawa, and H. Noda, eds. Handbook of Japanese Syntax, 701-750. De Gruyter Mouton .

45.

Takahashi, D. (2008). Noun phrase ellipsis. In S. Miyagawa and M. Saito, eds. The Oxford Hand book of Japanese Linguistics, 394-422. New York: Oxford University Press .

46.

Tomioka, S. (2014). Remarks on missing arguments in Japanese. Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, 7, 251-263 .