Lanaguage Research
Language Education Institute, Seoul National University
Linguistics

Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading

Hee-Rahk Chae1,
Corresponding Author: Professor Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Oedae-ro 81, Mohyeon-eup, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17035, Korea E-mail: hrchae@hufs.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2020 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 11, 2020 ; Revised: Dec 13, 2020 ; Accepted: Dec 29, 2020

Published Online: Dec 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

Korean [… V-koiss-] is ambiguous between progressive and resultative meanings. We assume that it is ambiguous in three ways: P(rogressive)-reading, R(esultative)-reading and p(seudo)-R-reading constructions. These constructions allow different sets of predicates in the [… V] position. Most previous analyses agreed that telic predicates are responsible for the (traditional) resultative reading. However, this telicity condition does not adequately predict the occurrence of the reading: i) p-R predicates are not necessarily telic, and ii) not all telic predicates can trigger the R construction. The aim of this paper is to provide a set of constraints operating on the R construction under the understanding that p-R predicates should be excluded in advance. First, only those telic predicates that can indicate a present state in their past tense form can trigger the R construction. In addition, we show the need to posit two more constraints: a syntactic/semantic constraint and a pragmatic constraint. We further show that the present approach based on these new observations can properly characterize the R construction while excluding the P and p-R constructions. In dealing with the present state reading, we face the recalcitrant phenomenon of a theta role change in the subject of the predicate concerned.

Keywords: [V-koiss-] in Korean; resultative construction; telicity; past time interpretation; present state reading

References

1.

Ahn, Y. (1995). The aspectual and temporal system of Korean: From the perspective of the two-component theory of aspect (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Texas at Austin .

2.

Borsley, R., & Borjars, K. (2011). Non-transformational syntax: Formal and explicit models of grammar. Blackwell .

3.

Chae, H.-R. (2014). A representational system of idiomatic constructions: For the building of computational resources. Linguistic Research, 31(3), 491-518 .

4.

Chae, H.-R. (2015a). A comprehensive syntactic analysis of Korean [… V … V] expressions I: Auxiliary predicate constructions and case alternation [written in Korean]. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40(3), 543-578 .

5.

Chae, H.-R. (2015b). A comprehensive syntactic analysis of Korean [… V … V] expressions II: Converb constructions and types of gaps [written in Korean]. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40(4), 703-746 .

6.

Chae, H.-R. (2018a). The structural ambiguity of the (im)perfective [V-ko iss-] in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 27(4), 377-411 .

7.

Chae, H.-R. (2018b). The pseuo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] construction in Korean. Language Research, 54(2), 157-200 .

8.

Chae, H.-R. (2020). Korean morphosyntax: Focusing on clitics and their roles in syntax. Routledge .

9.

Chung, D. (2005). What does bare -ko coordination say about post-verbal morphology in Korean?, Lingua, 115, 549-568 .

10.

Chung, T. (1994). Meaning and argument structure of -e issta [written in Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 24, 203-230 .

11.

Chung, T. (2007). An event structure approach to the Korean existential construction [written in Korean]. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 32(4), 779-801 .

12.

Culicover, P. (2009). Natural language syntax. Oxford University Press .

13.

Han, D.-w. (1999). On the ambiguities of Korean aspectual construction "-ko iss" [written in Korean]. Korean Semantics, 5, 215-248 .

14.

Hong, K.-S. (2013). The progressive in English and Korean [written in Korean]. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 38(4), 1049-1092 .

15.

Igarashi, Y., & Gunji, T. (1998). The temporal system in Japanese. In Gunji, T. & Hasida, K. (Eds.), Topics in the Constraint-Based Grammar of Japanese, pp. 81-97. Kluwer .

16.

Kim, C.-H. (2017). The study on an aspect of the combination between a prefinal ending '-ess' and lexical aspectual types [written in Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 81, 115-144 .

17.

Kim, J.-B. (2011). Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA imperfective construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36(4), 863-885 .

18.

Kim, J.-B. (2013). Aspectual properties of the Korean imperfective constructions. Language and Linguistics, 14(6), 1035-1074 .

19.

Kim, M.-J. (2009). A fresh look at the ambiguity puzzle of KO ISS imperfective in Korean. In Han, C.-h. et al. (Eds.) 1st Simon Fraser university working papers: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on East Asian linguistics .

20.

Kim, M.-J. (2011). The imperfective puzzle in Korean. In Dikken, M. den, & McClure, W. (Eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18, pp. 266-277. CSLI Publications .

21.

Kim, Y. (1993). The resultative progressive in Korean. Proceedings of the 29th regional meeting of Chicago linguistic society (pp. 251-265) .

22.

Kim, Y.-s. (2004). Event structure in Korean verbs and the event function '-ko issta.', Morphology, 6(1), 43-65 .

23.

Kim, Y.-s. (2006). The event structure and lexical aspect in the Korean verb. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 30, 31-61 .

24.

Lee, C. (1999). Aspects of aspect in Korean psych-predicates: Implications for psych-predicates. In Abraham, W., & Kulikov, L. (Eds.), Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity, pp. 223-249. Benjamins .

25.

Lee, E.H. (2006). Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(5), 695-717 .

26.

Lee, E.H. (2008). Argument structure and event structure: The case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17(2), 117-139 .

27.

Lee, H. S. (1991). Tense, aspect and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffixes in Korean from a typological perspective (Ph.D. dissertation). UCLA .

28.

Lee, K. (1978). On the semantic nature of the auxiliary iss-ta. Essays in Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Nummoe, Dr. Wung Huh, pp. 359-387. Seoul: Kyohaksa .

29.

Lee, K. (1993). A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul: Hankwuk Munhwasa .

30.

Nam, S. (2004). Event structure and aspectual character of Korean predicates [written in Korean]. Journal of Humanities, 52, 75-124 .

31.

Ogihara, T., & Park, E.-H. (2019). Aspect shift without coercion: Continuous causative verbs in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 28(2), 107-141 .

32.

Park, J.-H. (2011). Tense, aspect, and modality [written in Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 60, 289-322 .

33.

Park, C. (2014). The ambiguity and alternative construals of the [X-ko iss-ta] construction in Korean. Korean Linguistics, 16(1), 18-50 .

34.

Shirai, Y. (1998). Where the progressive and the resultative meet: Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Chinese, Korean and English. Studies in Language, 22(3), 661-692 .

35.

Song, J.-m. (1995). Progressives in Korean and Khalkha Mongolian. Working Papers in Linguistics & Phonetics 5, 251-270. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London .

36.

Song, J.-m. (2015). Semantic functions of the Korean sentence-terminal suffix -ney [written in Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 76, 123-159 .

37.

Song, M.-Y. (2002). Predicate types and the tense marker -ess in Korean. Language Research, 38(1), 1-29 .

38.

Song, N. S., & Song, J.-m (2005). Progressives in Korean, Japanese and Mongolian. International Journal of Korean Studies, 10, 178-202 .

39.

Spencer, A., & Luis, A. R. (2012). Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press .

40.

Suh, S. (2015). Structural asymmetry in the Korean imperfective constructions: -ko iss vs. -e iss. Linguistic Research, 32(2), 281-311 .

41.

Yang, J.-s. (2004). Against the complementarity of -go iss- and -eo iss- [written in Korean]. Hangeul, 266, 105-136 .

42.

Yeon, J., & Brown, L. (2011). Korean: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge .

43.

Yun, Y. (1986). Tense differences between Korean and English in Korean textbooks: Focusing on -ass. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 11, 107-130 .