The Effects of Sentential Context on the Perception of Assimilated Speech by L2 Listeners

Sung, Eunkyung; Kim, Youngeun; Lee, Sooyeon

doi:10.30961/lr.2019.55.1.1

Lang. Res. 55(1):1-32

pISSN: 0254-4474, eISSN: 2586-7113

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2019.55.1.1

Article

The Effects of Sentential Context on the Perception of Assimilated Speech by L2 Listeners

Eunkyung Sung¹^,^*, Youngeun Kim², Sooyeon Lee²

Author Information & Copylight ▼

¹Cyber Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

²Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

^*Corresponding Author : Professor, Department of English, Cyber Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 107, Imun-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea, E-mail: eks@cufs.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2019 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Mar 04, 2019 ; Revised: Apr 08, 2019 ; Accepted: Apr 08, 2019

Published Online: Apr 30, 2019

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to examine the effect of sentential context on perceptual compensation for assimilation and to compare compensation patterns between English and Korean listeners with a high proficiency level in English. To these ends, we conducted two experiments involving English coronal place assimilation. In the discrimination experiment, two types of stimuli (i.e., compound words and sentences) were presented. In the identification experiment, a target token including one of the two types of codas (i.e., coronal and non-coronal consonants) was embedded in a semantically neutral sentence. The results showed that in the discrimination experiment both listener groups demonstrated higher detection rates in sentences rather than in words. However, the Korean listeners were not as sensitive as the English listeners to phonetic differences of coda consonants in the unviable change context, and they showed more variations in detection rates than the English listeners. The results of the identification experiment presented a significant effect of coda type of target tokens on both listener groups. In sum, the L2 advanced learners were able to use sentential context to perceive assimilated speech, as were the L1 listeners.

Keywords: sentential context; assimilation; compensation; coronal place of articulation; L2 listeners; discrimination; identification

References

Abada, S. H., Baum, S. R. and Titone, D. (2008). The effects of contextual strength on phonetic identification in younger and older listeners. Experimental Aging Research 34(3), 232-250 .

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.44) [Computer software]. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences .

Boothroyd, A. and Nittrouer, S. (1988). Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(1), 101-114 .

Choi, H. (2015). The study of the Chinese learners' production and cognition of Korean nasal assimilation (written in Korean). Master's thesis. Ewha Womans University .

Darcy, I. (2002). Online processing of phonological variation in speech comprehension: The case of assimilation. In S. Hawkins and N. Nguyen, eds., Temporal Integration in the Perception of Speech. ISCA .

Darcy, I. (2006). Assimilation Phonologique et Reconnaissance des Mots. Berlin: Peter Lang SA .

Darcy, I., Peperkamp, S. and Dupoux, E. (2007). Bilinguals play by the rules. Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. Laboratory Phonology 9(9), 411-442 .

Darcy, I., Ramus, F., Christophe, A., Kinzler, K. and Dupoux, E. (2009). Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation. In F. Kugler, C. Fery and R. van de Vijer, eds., Variation and Gradience in Phonetics and Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .

Gaskell, M. G. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 144-158 .

10.

Gaskell, M. G. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1998). Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 380-396 .

11.

Gaskell, M. G. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology 45(2), 220-266 .

12.

Gaskell, M. G. and Snoeren, N. D. (2008). The impact of strong assimilation on the perception of connected speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 34(6), 1632-1647 .

13.

Gow, D. W. (2001). Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 133-159 .

14.

Gow, D. W. (2002). Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28(1), 163-179 .

15.

Gow, D. W. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 575-590 .

16.

Gow, D. W. and Im, A. (2004). A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 279-296 .

17.

Gow, D. W. and Olson, B. B. (2017). Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data. Language Cognitive Neuroscience 31(7), 841-855 .

18.

Kawahara, S. and Garvey, K. (2014). Nasal place assimilation and the perceptibility of place contrasts. In Eharhart Sabine, ed., Open Linguistics, 17-36. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter .

19.

Lee, S. (2005). The effect of assimilation contexts in word detection. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 11(1), 105-124 .

20.

Mitterer, H. and Blomert, L. (2003). Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation. Perception & Psychophysics 65(6), 956-969 .

21.

Mitterer, H., Csépe, V., Honbolygo, F. and Blomert, L. (2006). The recognition of phonologically assimilated words does not depend on specific language experience. Cognitive Science 30, 451-479 .

22.

Lukianchenko, A. (2014). From sound to meaning: Quantifying contextual effects in resolution of l2 phonolexical ambiguity. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland .

23.

Otake, T. and Yoneyama, K. (1996). The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100(6), 3831-3842 .

24.

Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2), 8-13 .

25.

Sumner, M. and Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 322-338 .

26.

Sung, E. (2018). Compensation for phonological assimilation: Obstruent nasalization and coronal place assimilation. Linguistic Research 35(1), 145-178 .