Article

The Morphosyntax of Jejuan –ko Clause Linkages

Soung-U Kim 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1SOAS University of London
*Corresponding Author : Research Fellow, Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures SOAS University of London 10 Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom, E-mail: sk138@soas.ac.uk

ⓒ Copyright 2019 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 22, 2019 ; Revised: Jul 02, 2019 ; Accepted: Jul 20, 2019

Published Online: Aug 31, 2019

ABSTRACT

While clause linkage is a relatively understudied area within Koreanic linguistics, the Korean –ko clause linkage has been studied more extensively. Authors have deemed it interesting since depending on the successive/non-successive interpretation of its events, a –ko clause linkage exhibits all or no properties of what is traditionally known as coordination or subordination. Jejuan –ko clauses may look fairly similar to Korean on the surface, and exhibit a similar lack of semantic specification. This study shows that the traditional, dichotomous coordination-subordination opposition is not applicable to Jejuan –ko clauses. I propose that instead of applying a-priori categories to the exploration of clause linkage in Koreanic varieties, one should apply a multidimensional model that lets patterns emerge in an inductive way.

Keywords: clause linkage; –ko converb; Jejuan; Jejueo; Ceycwu dialect

References

1.

Barnes-Sadler, Simon. (2017). Central Asian and Yanbian Korean in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D thesis (4458). SOAS University of London .

2.

Bickel, Balthasar. (2010). Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril, ed., Clause-Hierarchy and Clause-Linking: The Syntax and Pragmatics Interface, 51-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

3.

Brown, Lucien and Jaehoon Yeon. (2015). Varieties of contemporary Korean. In Lucien Brown and Jaehoon Yeon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 439-458. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons .

4.

Cho, Sae-Youn. (2004). Sequentiality and non-tensed verbal coordination in Korean. Paper presented at the 30th Berkeley Linguistics Society Conference, February 13-16, 2004. Berkeley, CA .

5.

Cristofaro, Sonia. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

6.

Croft, William. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

7.

Crowley, Terry. (2007). Field Linguistics: A Beginner's Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

8.

Culicover, Peter W. and Ray S. Jackendoff. (1997). Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2), 195-218 .

9.

Diessel, Holger. (2013). Adverbial subordination. In Luraghi, Silvia and Claudia Parodi, eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, 341-353. London: Bloomsbury Publishing .

10.

Everett, Daniel L. (2001). Monolingual field research. In Newman, Paul and Martha Ratcliff, eds., Linguistic Fieldwork, 166-188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

11.

Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

12.

Gast, Volker. and Holger Diessel. (2012). The typology of clause linkage: status quo, challenges, prospects. In Gast, Volker and Holger Diessel, eds., Clause Linkage in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Data-Driven Approaches to Cross-Clausal Syntax, 1-34. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton .

13.

Gippert, Jost, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Ulrike Mosel, eds. (2006). Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton .

14.

Givón, Talmy. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in Syntax, 187-220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

15.

Haegeman, Liliane. (2010). The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3), 628-648 .

16.

Haegeman, Liliane. (2003). Conditional clauses: external and internal syntax. Mind and Language, 18(4), 317-339 .

17.

Haiman, John. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56, 515-540 .

18.

Haiman, John. and Sandra A. Thompson (1984). "Subordination" in Universal Grammar. In Brugman, Claudia and Monica Macauley, eds., Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 510-523. Berkeley: University of California Press .

19.

Haspelmath, Martin. (2007a). Coordination. In Shopen, Timothy, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description II: Complex Constructions, 1-51. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

20.

Haspelmath, Martin. (2007b). Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1), 119-132 .

21.

Haspelmath, Martin. (2004). Coordinating constructions: an overview. In Haspelmath, Martin, ed., Coordinating Constructions, 3-40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

22.

Haspelmath, Martin. (1995). The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Haspelmath, Martin and Ekkehard König, eds., Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms-Adverbial Participles, Gerunds, 1-55. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton .

23.

Haspelmath, Martin. and Ekkehard, König., eds. (1995). Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms-Adverbial Participles, Gerunds, 1-55. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton .

24.

Hong, Jisup. (2012). Connective Polysemy and Clause Linkage Typology in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation. UC Berkeley. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58z7r4dg [Accessed 2019-08-22] .

25.

Hong, Jong-Rim. (2001). Ceycwupangen Yenkyelemi '-n, -ŋ'ey tayhaye [About the Connective Suffixes '-n', '-ŋ' in Ceycwu Dialect]. Enehak [Linguistics] 38, 271-304 .

26.

Hyun, Pyeong-Hyo and Young-Bong Kang. (2011). Ceycwue Cwosa Emi Sacen [A Dictionary of Jejuan Suffixes and Particles]. Jeju City: Gak Book Publishing .

27.

Jendraschek, Gerd. and Yong-Min Shin. (2018). Korean converbs between coordination and subordination. Linguistics 56(5), 1099-1139 .

28.

Jendraschek, Gerd. and Yong-Min Shin. (2011). Suffixal clause-linking in Korean on the subordination-coordination continuum. Presentation held at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea in Logroño, Spain, 2011-09-11..

29.

Jones, Mari. C. and Sarah Ogilvie, eds. (2013). Keeping Languages Alive: Documentation, Pedagogy And Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

30.

Kang, Young-Bong. (2007). Ceycwue [Jeju language]. National Folk Museum, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province .

31.

Kazenin, Konstantin. I. and Yakov G. Testelets. (2004). Where coordination meets subordination: Converb constructions in Tsakhur (Daghestanian). In Haspelmath, Martin, ed., Coordinating Constructions, 227-240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

32.

Kim, Jee-Hong. (2017). Non-canonical ending systems in Jeju Korean. Pangenhak, 26, 229-260 .

33.

Kim, Jee-Hong. (2016.) Ceycwu pangenuy senemalemiwa cwongkyelemi cheykyey [The pre- .

313.

109-171 .

34.

Kim, Jee-Hong. (2014). Ceycwu Pangenuy Thwongsa Kiswulkwa Selmyeng: Kipwonkwumunuy Kineungpemcwu Pwunsek [The Description and Explication of Ceycwu Dialect Syntax: the analysis of functional categories within a basic clause]. Seoul: Kyungjin .

35.

Kim, Soon-Ja. (2010). Tolkak Tolkak Minyeng Ssameng Ulin Nulkescwu - Aywelup Pwongsengli Kangcisuk Halmeni Sayngay Kwusul ["Well, we would work the cotton again and again, that's how we got older" - a life history of Ms Kang Cisuk from Aewol-Eup Bongseong-Ri]. Jeju: Jeju National University, National Language Institute .

36.

Kim, Soung-U. (2018a). A Multi-Modal Documentation of Jejuan Conversations. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. Retrieved from https://elar.soas.ac.uk/deposit/0351. Accessed on [2019-08-10] .

37.

Kim, Soung-U. (2018b). Finiteness in Jejuan Adverbial Clauses: a Canonical Typology Approach. Ph.D thesis. SOAS University of London (4617) .

38.

Ko, Dong-Ho, Sang-Jo Song, Chang-Myeong O, Sun-Deok Mun and Seung-Hun O (2016). Ceycwusmaluy ihay [On the Jeju lect]. Jeju City: Jeju Studies Research Centre at Jeju Development Research Institute .

39.

Ko, Young-Lim. (2009). Ceycwu pangenuy tayhwachey tamhwaey nathanan ekyang yenkwu - 70tay isang kwolyeng hwacalul chwungsimulwo [Intonation characteristics in conversational discourse of Cheju dialect - case study on speakers older than 70]. Hankwukenemunhwa 40, 5-28 .

40.

Kroeger, Paul. (2004). Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

41.

Kwon, Nayoung and Maria Polinsky. (2008). What does coordination look like in a head final language? In Lewandowski, Barbara, ed., Asymmetric Events, 87-102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

42.

Kwon, Nayoung. (2004). Syntactic and semantic mismatches in the Korean ko-construction. In Schmeiser, Benjamin, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher and Angelo Rodriguez, eds., WCCFL 23 Proceedings, 101-114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press .

43.

Lee, Ki-Mun. and S. Robert Ramsey. (2011). A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

44.

Lee, Jenny. S. (2014). Adjoined koP in Korean clausal coordination: implications for the Across-the-Board analysis. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1). Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol20/iss1/21 [retrieved 2019-02-21] .

45.

Lee, Sean. (2015). A Sketch of Language History in the Korean Peninsula. Mokrousov, Igor, ed., PLoS ONE 10.5 .

46.

Lehmann, Christian. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman, John and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, 181-226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

47.

Long, Daniel. and Young-Cheol Yim. (2002). Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects. In Long, Daniel and Dennis R. Preston, eds., Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology II, 249-275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

48.

Longacre, Robert. E. (2007). Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Shopen, Timothy, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description II, 372-420. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

49.

Lyons, John. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

50.

Matthewson, Lisa. (2004). On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(4), 369-415 .

51.

Moseley, Christopher, ed. (2010). Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, 3rd ed. UNESCO Publishing .

52.

Mun, Sug-Yeong. (2006). Ceycwupangenuy '-emsi-'uy pemcwuwa kwanlyentwoyn myech muncey [On issues regarding the categories related to '-emsi' of the Ceycwu dialect]. Hyengthayron 8(2), 393-403 .

53.

Mun, Sug-Yeong. (2004). Ceycwu pangenuy hyeoncaysicey hyengthayswoey tayhaye [On the present tense morphology of the Ceycwu dialect]. Hyengthayron 6(2), 293-316 .

54.

Mun, Sug-Yeong. (1998). Ceycwutwo panenguy sisang hyengthayey tayhan yenkwu [On the tense-aspect morphology of the Ceycwu dialect]. Masters dissertation, Seoul National University. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/53637 [retrieved 2019-08-13] .

55.

Nikolaeva, Irina. (2013). Unpacking finiteness. In Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina, and Greville G. Corbett, eds., Canonical Morphology and Syntax, 99-122. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

56.

Nikolaeva, Irina. (2010). Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12), 1176-1189 .

57.

Nikolaeva, Irina, ed. (2007). Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

58.

O'Grady, William. (2014). Jejueo: Korea's other language. Paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Korean Studies, 5th-7th Nov 2014, at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. Retrieved from http://congress.aks.ac.kr/korean/files/2_1413765292.pdf [Accessed 2019-08-22] .

59.

Olson, Michael. (1981). Barai Clause Junctures: Toward a Functional Theory of Interclausal Relations. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation .

60.

Pak, Dong-Ho. (2013). A study of the Korean clausal connectives '-ese' and '-ko' of temporal sequence. Acta Koreana 16(1), 5-21 .

61.

Pangenyenkwuhoy. (2001). Pangenhaksacen [A Dictionary of Dialectology]. Seoul: Taehaksa .

62.

Plank, Frans. (ed.). 2016. Linguistic Typology 20(2) .

63.

Roberts, John. R. (1988). Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1), 45-63 .

64.

Ross, John. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology .

65.

Rudnitskaya, Elena. (1998). Syntactic properties of the altaic coordination construction in Korean. Sprachtypologische Universalienforschung 51(2), 179-198 .

66.

Silva, David. (2010). Death, taxes, and language change: The inevitable divergence of Korean varieties as spoken worldwide. In Fouser, Robert J., ed., Contemporary Korean Linguistics: International Perspectives - In Honor of Professor Sang-Oak Lee, 300-319. Seoul: Taehaksa .

67.

Sohn, Ho-Min. (2009). The semantics of clause linking in Korean. In Dixon, Robert M. W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, eds., The Semantics of Clause Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 285-317. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

68.

Sohn, Ho-Min. (1999). The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

69.

Song, Sang-Jo. (2011). Ceycwumaleyse Ttaykalimswo '-ng, -n'kwa Ssikkuthtuluy Hwoung [The morphemes -ŋ, -n of temporal distinction and the interaction of suffixes]. Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa .

70.

Williams, Edwin. (1978). Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 31-43 .

71.

Yang, Chang-Yong and Wonbo Kim. (2013). Ceycwue 'key'uy tamhwacek kinungey tayhan kwochal [A study on the discourse functions of -key in the Jeju language]. Language and Linguistics, 59, 143-164 .

72.

Yeon, Jaehoon. (2012). Korean dialects: a general survey. In Tranter, Nicholas, ed., The Languages of Japan and Korea, 168-185. Abingdon: Routledge .

73.

Yoon, James. (1997). Coordination (A)Symmetry. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 7, 3-30 .

74.

Yoon, Jeong-Mee. (1996). Verbal coordination in Korean and English and the checking approach to verbal morphology. Ene 21(4), 1105-1135 .

75.

Yuasa, Etsuyo. and Jerry M. Sadock. (2002). Pseudo-subordination: A mismatch between syntax and semantics. Journal of Linguistics, 38(1), 87-111 .

The submission guidelines have been revised.


The submission guidelines of the Language Research have been revised as of September 25, 2019.

Please check and submit new papers based on the new guidelines.

https://www.elanguageresearch.org/author/guideline

Thank you for your interest in the Language Research.

I don't want to open this window for a day.