Article

고등학교 프랑스어 수행평가 실태 연구

김정숙 1 ,
Jungsug Kim 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1둔촌고등학교
1Doonchon High School
Corresponding Author: 교사 둔촌고등학교 05367 서울시 강동구 명일로 140 , E-mail: aramchi21@nate.com

ⓒ Copyright 2020 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 28, 2020 ; Revised: Apr 02, 2020 ; Accepted: Apr 03, 2020

Published Online: Apr 30, 2020

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore the current situation and specifics as well as teacher understanding of the performance assessment that exists at the center of the current curriculum assessment, which was revised in 2015. The results of a survey of 35 high school French teachers and 14 of the respondents’ assessment plans are as follows. Firstly, although the application of the French-language performance assessment (measured in percentage) has increased, the assessment does not seem to function as an assessment of higher order thinking due to the students’ limited French ability. Secondly, French teachers are positively aware of the performance assessment, and they attempt to optimize its proper function. In particular, assessments in the cultural areas are conducted for the aspects of creativity, logical thinking, and justice. Thirdly, the greatest difficulty teachers face in terms of implementing the performance assessment is securing objectivity and fairness; this is followed by teachers having to manage an increase in tasks such as grading. Lastly, the study demonstrates that the assessment of different performance areas by their respective teachers can be a significant issue given the potential for error in classifying areas and the lack of feasibility with respect to assessment standards. This seems to be an urgent issue for which a solution should be prioritized, especially in light of the fact that college admissions based on performance evaluations are set to be officially implemented.

Keywords: French language assessment; performance assessment; curriculum revised in 2015; areas of performance assessment; assessment criteria

References

1.

Jung, Y. J. (1999). A propos de l'évaluation performative. Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises, 8, 317-324 .

2.

Kim, H. J. (2007). Les activités d'apprentissage de la culture française en classe de FLE dans les lycées sud-coréens. Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises, 25, 29-53 .

3.

Kim, H. J. (2009). Comment motiver les élèves en classe de FLE?. Proceedings of the Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises Conference, 153-180. Seoul: Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises .

4.

Kim, Y. J. (1999). The Meaning and method of performance assessment. Proceedings of the Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises Conference, 51-78. Seoul: Société Coréenne d'Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises .

5.

Lee, K. N., Kim, E. J., Kim, J. S., Kim, J. H., Kim, H. Z., Park, D. Y.,...Hong, S. H. (2015). Didactique du français. Seoul: Shinasa .

6.

Ministry of Education. (1981). High school curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education .

7.

Ministry of Education. (1992). High school curriculum (I). Seoul: Ministry of Education .

8.

Ministry of Education. (1998). Understanding of performance assessment. Seoul: Ministry of Education .

9.

Ministry of Education. (2015). The general guideline of elementary and secondary curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education .

10.

Ministry of Education. (2018A). High school credit system. Retrieved from https://www. hscredit.kr .

11.

Ministry of Education. (2018B). Assessment Standards in 2015 Revised national Curriculum(second foreign language). Sejong: Ministry of Education .

12.

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(MEST). (2009). The general guideline of elementary and secondary curriculum. Seoul: MEST .

13.

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). Advancing plan about student affairs systems of secondary school. Seoul: MEST .

14.

Seong, T. J. (2014). Modern educational evaluation. Seoul: Hakjisa .

15.

Seoul Metropolitan office of Education. (2019). 2019 implementation plan for secondary curriculum evaluation. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan office of Education .

16.

Shon, M. J. (2013). A study on the performance assessment of practical Chinese at middle school course. Chinese Language Education and Research, 18, 1-22 .

17.

Sin, M. S. (2008). A study on the features and reform direction of performance assessment policy. Korean Language Education Research, 33, 473-502 .