Article

Single/Multiple Fragments with NUN

Myung-Kwan Park 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1Dongguk University
Corresponding Author: E-mail: parkmk@dongguk.edu

ⓒ Copyright 2021 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 31, 2021 ; Revised: Nov 26, 2021 ; Accepted: Nov 17, 2021

Published Online: Dec 31, 2021

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the Korean ‘what/how about’ construction. In Korean, unlike English, the wh-question word ‘what/how’ is typically phonologically suppressed and the particle ‘-(N)UN’ is used, corresponding to the English preposition ‘about’. Departing from Chung’s (2021) recent work on this construction, this paper makes three claims. First, three distinct uses of this construction indicate that ‘-(N)UN’ can be not only a contrastive topic marker but also a (contrastive) focus marker. Second, the underlying representation of this construction is that the pre-‘(N)UN’ part has a clausal structure that undergoes elision, leaving behind single or multiple fragment remnants. Meanwhile, the post-‘(N)UN’ part has ettehkey toy(-ess)-ni ‘what happened’/ etteh-ni ‘how’/ ettehkey ha-l ke-ni ‘how do you cope with’, where ettekey or etteha- asks a polar or wh-constituent question relating to the pre-‘(N)UN’ clause. Third, the formation of single or multiple fragment remnants is achieved via Move & Delete, where more specifically Move is the operation of scrambling widely available to the Korean language.

Keywords: Korean ‘what about; -(N)UN; contrastive focus; wh-less; fragment; Move & Delete

References

1.

An, D.-H. (2016). Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implications. Journal of East Asian Linguistic, 25, 313-350 .

2.

Beaver, D. I., Roberts, C., Simons, M., & Tonhauser, J. (2017). Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 265-284 .

3.

Bledin, J., & Rawlins, K. (2021). About what about: Topicality at the semantics-pragmatics interface. A handout/abstract read/posted at the 2021 SALT .

4.

Büring, D. (2003). On D-tree, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511-545 .

5.

Chomsky, N. (2019). Lecture at UCLA. April 29th, 30th, May 1st, 2nd. [a manuscript with some changes is available on https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485] .

6.

Chomsky, N. (2020). Lecture at LSJ. November 22nd .

7.

Chomsky, N. (2021). Lecture at WCCFL. April 9th .

8.

Chung, D. (2000). Wh-questions without Wh-words. The Preceedings of the 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 57-66 .

9.

Chung, D. (2021). Elliptical contrastive topic construction and theories of multi-elemental fragments. Studies in Generative Grammar, 31-1, 169-193 .

10.

Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press .

11.

Jun, Y. (2006). Tayco hwacheywa tayco choscemuy phyoci 'nun' (Korean marker 'NUN' for contrastive topic and contrastive focus). Hangeul, 274, 171-200 .

12.

Jun, Y. (2019). Hankwuke cengpokwucophyoci 'un/nun'uy uymi - tayco uymilul cwungsimulo. (A semantics for (n)un as an information structure marker: With a focus on the meaning of contrast). Linguistics, 85, 99-137 .

13.

Kim, I. (2016). Can Korean -(n)un mark (contrastive) focus? Language Sciences, 56, 105-117 .

14.

Kim, Y.-H. (2020). Wh-less wh-questions in Korean and their implications for the position(s) of WHY. Studies in Generative Grammar, 30-1, 1-30 .

15.

Kotek, H., & Erlewine, M. Y. (2016). Covert pied-piping in English multiple wh-questions. Linguistic Inquiry, 47(4), 669-693 .

16.

Lee, C. (2003). Contrative topic and/or contrastive focus. Japanese Korean Linguistics, 12, 352-364 .

17.

Munar, N. (1999). Free relatives as defective wh-elements: Evidence from the North-Western Italian dialects. Unpublished article, Padova & Venice .

18.

Park, M.-K. (2016). The syntax of multiple fragments in Korean: Overt absorption, Max-Elide, and scrambling. Language Research, 52, 421-450 .

19.

Park, M.-K., & Shin, U.-J., (2017). On the long-distance scrambling/phonological suppression of adjuncts in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(3), 675-695 .

20.

Partee, B. (1989). Speaker's reply. In S. Allén (Ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65 (pp. 124-137). Berlin: De Gruyter .

21.

Perry, J. (1989). Possible worlds and subject matter. Discussion of Barbara H. Partee's paper "Possible worlds in model-theoretic semantics: A linguistic perspective". In S. Allén (Ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65 (pp. 124-137). Berlin: De Gruyter .

22.

Perry, J. (2000). The problem of the essential indexical and other essays. Stanford: CSLI Publications .

23.

Richards, N. (2001). Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

24.

Ian, R. (2010). Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press .

25.

Rudin, C. (1988). On multiple questions and multiple Wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 455-501 .

26.

Saito, M. (1994). Additional-wh effects and the adjunction site theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, 195-240 .

27.

Sohn, K.-W. (1994). Adjunction to argument, free ride and a minimalist program. In K. Masatoshi, & H. Ura (Ed.), Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 315-334). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy .

28.

Suzuki, T. (1997). WH-deletion in Japanese: Formal properties of informal style of Japanese. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 1-39 .

29.

Takano, Y. (2002). Surprising constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11-3, 243-301 .

30.

Yoon, J.-M. (2002). QR, interface economy and pied-piping in English. Language Research, 38(4), 1077-1130 .

31.

Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1983). Deleting named morphemes. Lingua, 59(2-3), 155-175 .