Article

Contextualized Existential Constructions in Mandarin Chinese

Pei-Jung Kuo 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1National Chiayi University
Corresponding Author:Professor Department of Foreign Languages National Chiayi University No.85, Wunlong Village, Minsyong Township, Chiayi County, Taiwan E-mail: domo@mail.ncyu.edu.tw

ⓒ Copyright 2022 Language Education Institute, Seoul National University. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 26, 2022 ; Revised: Oct 02, 2022 ; Accepted: Nov 07, 2022

Published Online: Dec 31, 2022

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes that in addition to the typical “out-of-the-blue” existential construction, a kind of contextualized existential construction exists in Mandarin Chinese. This form does not exhibit the predicate restriction observed in typical existential constructions cross-linguistically. It is argued that this type of existential construction involves a topic-comment structure and functions as a subtype of the Existential Coda Construction discussed by Zhang (2007, 2008). The current analysis also explains the apparent lack of a definiteness restriction for specific Mandarin Chinese existential constructions.

Keywords: existential construction; information structure; topic; predicate restriction; definiteness restriction

References

1.

Abott, B. (1993). A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 39-55 .

2.

Babby, L. H. (1980). Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers .

3.

Badan, L. & Del Gobbo, F. (2011). On the syntax of topic and focus in Chinese. In P. Benincà & N. Munaro (Eds.), Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 5, pp. 63-90). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

4.

Basilico, D. (1997). The topic is 'There'. Studia Linguistica, 51(3), 278-316 .

5.

Bentley, D., Ciconte, F. M., & Cruschina, S. (2013). Existential constructions in crosslinguistic perspective. Rivista di Linguistica, 25(1), 1-13 .

6.

Brentano, F. (1924). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot .

7.

Chang, H. (2004, May 21-23). The definiteness and information status of the NPs in Mandarin 'you'-existentials [Conference session]. The 16th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-16). The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United Sates .

8.

Chierchia, G. (1995). Individual level predicates as inherent generics. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 176-223). Chicago: Chicago University Press .

9.

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

10.

Fang, H. & Lin, T. J. (2008). The Mandarin you existential: A verbal analysis. UST Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 43-56 .

11.

Francez, I. (2007). Existential propositions (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, U.S.A .

12.

Hsin, A. (2002). On indefinite subject NPs in Chinese. Chinese Studies, 20(2), 353-376 .

13.

Huang, C. J. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 226-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

14.

Huang, C. J. (1988). Shuo shi he you [On shi and you]. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy, 59, 43-64 .

15.

Jin, D. (2020). A semantic account of quantifier-induced intervention effects in Chinese why-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 43(4), 345-387 .

16.

Kim, Y. (1997). A situation semantic account of existential sentences (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, U.S.A .

17.

Kuroda, S. (1972). The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language, 9, 153-185 .

18.

Ladusaw, W. (2000). Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In R. H. Laurence & Y Kato (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives (pp. 232-242). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

19.

Leonetti, M. (2008). Definiteness effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions. In A. Klinge & H. Hoeg-Muller (Eds.), Essays on nominal determination (pp. 131-162). Amsterdam: Benjamins .

20.

Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .

21.

Li, Y. A. 2006. Chinese ba. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (Vol. I, pp. 374-468). Oxford: Blackwell .

22.

Lin, T. J. (2008). Locative subject in Mandarin Chinese. Nanzan Linguistics, 4, 69-88 .

23.

Liu, Y. (2011). Topic-comment and the Chinese Existential Construction. In Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-23) (Vol. 2, pp. 48-65). Eugene .

24.

McCloskey, J. (2014). Irish existentials in context. Syntax, 17(4), 343-384 .

25.

McNally, L. (1992). An interpretation for the English existential construction (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz .

26.

McNally, L. (2011). Existential sentences. In M. Claudia, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.). Semantics: An internal handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 1829-1848). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .

27.

Moro, A. (1997). The raising of predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

28.

Nagaya, N. (2019). The thetic/categorical distinction in tagalog revisited: A contrastive perspective. Gengo Kenkyu, 156, 47-66 .

29.

Paul, W. (2005). Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 33, 111-134 .

30.

Paul, W., Lu, Y. & Lee, T. H. (2020). Existential and locative constructions in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review, 37(2), 231-267 .

31.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Kluwer .

32.

Shi, D. (2000). Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 76(2), 383-408 .

33.

Stockwell, R. P., Schachter, P. & Partee, B. H. (1973). The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .

34.

Teng, S. (1978). Modification and the structures of existential sentences. In R. C. Cheng, Y. C. Li, & T. C. Tang (Eds.), Proceedings of symposium of chinese linguistics, LSA (pp. 197-210). Taipei: Student Books .

35.

Walker, J. A. (2009, April 2-4). (Dis)agreement in the Eastern Caribbean: Evidence from Bequia [Conference session]. The Eighth Creolistics Workshop, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany .

36.

Zhang, N. (2007). Existential coda constructions revisited. In Q. Lin & S. Shyu (Eds.), Discussions on language and culture (pp. 25-62). Kaohsiung: College of Liberal Arts, NSYSU .

37.

Zhang, N. (2008). Existential coda constructions as internally headed relative clause constructions. The Linguistics Journal, 3(3), 8-54 .

38.

Zou, K. (1995). The syntax of the Chinese ba-construction and verb compounds: a morpho-syntactic analysis (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, U.S.A .

39.

Zucchi, A. (1995). The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 33-78 .